Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Third Party Candidates Influence in Elections

Author: Margaret Deering 


Third party candidates influence the two party system. People tend to not vote for third party candidates because they know that that candidate will not win the election. On the reverse some people vote for the third party candidate in opposition to both parties, making a statement against the two party system.

Here is a diagram that shows different third party presidents and their influence on elections

YEAR
PARTY
CANDIDATE
VOTE%
ELECTORAL VOTE
OUTCOME in Next Election
1832
Anti-Masonic
William Wirt
7.8%
7
Endorsed Whig Candidate
1848
Free Soil
Martin Van Buren
10.1
0
5% of the vote, absorbed by Republican Party
1856
Whig-American
Millard Fillmore
21.5
8
Dissolved
1860
Southern Democrat
John C. Breckinridge
18.1
72
Dissolved
1860
Constitutional Union
John Bell
12.6
39
Dissolved
1892
Populist
James B. Weaver
8.5
22
Absorbed by Democratic Party
1912
Progressive
Teddy Roosevelt
27.5
88
Returned to Republican Party
1912
Socialist
Eugene V. Debbs
6.0
0
Won 3% of the vote
1924
Progressive
Robert M. LaFollette
16.6
13
Returned to Republican Party
1948
States' Rights
Strom Thurmond
2.4
39
Dissolved
1948
Progressive
Henry Wallace
2.4
0
Won 1.4% of the vote
1968
American Independent
George Wallace
13.5
46
Won 1.4% of the vote
1980
Independent
John Anderson
6.6
0
Dissolved
1992
Reform
H. Ross Perot
18.9
0
Won 8.4% of the vote
1996
Reform
H. Ross Perot
8.4
0
Did not run
2000
Reform
Ralph Nader
2.7
0
Ran Next election
2004
Green
Ralph Nader
1.0
0
--



             Although sometimes third party candidate can have an effect on the election, in the election of 1912 Theodore Roosevelt received 27.5 % of the popular vote, the highest in election history received by a third party candidate. He won 6 states while the incumbent Republican president Taft only won 2. The rest went to the Democratic candidate Woodrow Wilson. Wilson ended up winning the election especially because of his 82% Electoral College vote. While Roosevelt only earned 16.5 % but still passed Taft who only had 1.5 %.

This website shows the election results:

http://geoelections.free.fr/USA/etats/1912.gif



         This election makes a point that when campaigned correctly a third party can have an influence on the election. Roosevelt did just that, more then one in every four people voted for Roosevelt. That had a large influence on the reelection of Taft. People who might usually vote Republican instead decided to vote for Roosevelt who was running on the progressive platform. In addition people who might have voted for Taft in the past saw all of the confusion in the Republican Party and they decided to switch to vote for Wilson. The election really worked out in Wilson's favor because without a strong Republican Candidate Wilson was the only influential candidate left. This however would not have happened if there were other candidates to choose from. This really identifies the two party system and how it can hinder or help a canidate in an election. 
         Of course following this election Teddy Roosevelt decided to change his platform to the Republican Party where he ended up winning the election. The fact that once Roosevelt changed his party he was elected also says something about our political two party system. It says that the system is so strict it is often hard to break though. When Roosevelt entered the two party system he was elected but before when he was not a part of it he was not elected.
             The reason in my opinion why third parties do not have as much of an influence on elections has to do with funding. There are people that always tend to fund the Republican Party or always tend to fund the Democrat Party. But there is not as much money available for Third Party candidates. Because less money given to them they cannot campaign as much as the other two parties. The media tends to report little to nothing about the third party candidates. Leaving them with less publicity and not giving them influence on the election. The presidential debate for example that takes place before every election ignores the third party candidate only allowing the democratic and republican candidate to dispute.

1 comment:

  1. I think that third party candidates should get more funding so that we can have more options when voting for the president

    ReplyDelete